SCOTUSblog is delighted to announce that it has been acquired by Dispatch Media, Inc., and will round out The Dispatch’s coverage of the Supreme Court and the rule of law.

Back when I first starting blogging in 2001-ish, with my ill-fated Promote the Progress patent law blog, SCOTUSblog quickly became a model for legal blogging. The site has a long track record of consistently delivering current, high quality content. It's weird to see this announcement that SCOTUSblog has been acquired by Dispatch Media, which has the following description in the title its main site, The Dispatch: Unbiased News & Informed Conservative Analysis. SCOTUSblog certainly has every right to choose its own future, but I hate to think of SCOTUSblog content as either conservative or liberal. The Founding Manifesto for The Dispatch does a nice job explaining that its focus is more on conservatism and not on the Republican Party, which helps but I'll still be reading new SCOTUSblog content through a new lens.

tags: law scotus blogging

posted by matt in Monday, April 28, 2025

The legal reality is that Roe v. Wade never rested on the soundest of constitutional grounds. The Court didn't have the votes for an equal protection footing, so the majority opinion relied on a newfound fundamental right to privacy. That is, and always was, the Achilles heel of the decision. The late Justice Ginsburg criticized the decision, and questioned its long term viability, for this very reason.

At some point, you expect stare decisis to strengthen all but the shakiest of legal grounds for a Supreme Court decision, but it just wasn't there this time.

So the optimistic view following yesterday's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which I'm choosing to take, is that we've been given an opportunity to present the issue in a way that lets a future Supreme Court base a rights-affirming decision on a more stable legal footing.

tags: law scotus

postposted by matt in Saturday, June 25, 2022

U.S. history is staked with milestones relating to the attainment of rights–freedom, suffrage, privacy, equality. I've always viewed our system as a process that moves toward more rights for its people. Progress is achieved in fits and starts, of course, but our history has always moved in the same direction–more rights for the people.

That all changed today when the Supreme Court actually eliminated an existing, federally protected right of all women of the United States by overturning its decision in Roe v. Wade.

The country I know and love is suddenly a country that takes rights away from its people.

That's backwards. And disgusting. And horrific.

tags: law scotus

posted by matt in Friday, June 24, 2022

No coup for you, Donny.

The dissent is actually interesting: the point made by Alito and Thomas is an extremely narrow one - they feel the Court must accept a filing on cases in which it has original jurisdiction (state v. state). In a bit of a slap, they explain that they would not grant any other relief (the injunction sought).

tags: politics election trump scotus

posted by matt in Friday, December 11, 2020